Richel Hogenkamp vs Constance Sibille Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
W L L W L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Hogenkamp 3 - 0 Sibille
They have played 7 sets in total, with Hogenkamp winning 6 and Sibille winning 1. The last match between Hogenkamp and Sibille was at the Montpellier, 15-06-2015, Quarterfinals, Clay with Richel Hogenkamp getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Richel Hogenkamp | 3 |
| Constance Sibille | 0 |
Montpellier(15-06-2015)
7
5
6
1
| Hogenkamp | Stats | Sibille |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 94 | Highest Rank | 265 |
| 33 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 5 |
| 59% (414-282) | Career Total W/L | 56% (259-203) |
| $542,444 | Career Prize Money | $2,271 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 41 | Games Won | 25 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Constance Sibille Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(3) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Gina Veyder
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Constance Sibille
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Warona Mdlulwa
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Yu Shan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Constance Sibille
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Mathilde Dury
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Orange
Player
Constance Sibille
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Constance Sibille
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Olympe Lancelot
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (414/282) | Win/Loss | 56% (259/203) |
| 57% (914/682) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (574/460) |
| 52% (7695/7005) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4883/4402) |
| 57% (98/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (50/36) |
| 62% (215/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (138/107) |
| 60% (87/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (71/60) |
| 42% (14/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 646 | Aces Total | 120 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1564 | Total Double Faults | 428 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 562.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 561.05 |
| 59% (16729/28277) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3664/6002) |
| 62% (10425/16729) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2257/3664) |
| 46% (5300/11548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1071/2338) |
| 47% (1708/3597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (406/808) |
| 45% (12635/27988) | Return Points Win % | 48% (2969/6209) |
| 54% (38/33) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (8/8) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (56/54) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (287/182) | Challenger W/L | 50% (101/100) |
| 92% (23/2) | Futures W/L | 61% (154/98) |
| 60% (409/684) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (253/449) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (67/142) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (47/81) |
| 58% (122/212) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/121) |
| 89% (391/349) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (258/222) |
| 11% (391/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (258/36) |
| 21% (305/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (202/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
